New Rules

I suspect that some people accuse me of being 'soft on religion' because I reject the argument, "Some religious beliefs are X; therefore, all religious beliefs are X", and because I can understand how a person can believe an absurdity when they are surrounded by people who believe an absurdity.

However, it is perfectly consistent with the proposition, "Some religoius beliefs are X" that "Some religious beliefs are X".

And, so, I have nothing to complain about with respect to Bill Mahar's "New Rules"

As posted at Non Credo Deus.